The Dynamic Competition Paradigm: Insights and Implications
BRG is home to renowned thought leaders and experts considered authorities in their fields of work. Our timely research and perspectives provide analysis and insights on the most important issues facing the industries and organizations we serve.
David Teece identifies and expands on the weaknesses of static analysis, a method of measuring competition by evaluating firms that engage in cost-saving and cost-cutting in the pursuit of efficiency, as a means of measuring competition. He argues that as an alternative to static analysis, economists should use a forward-looking capabilities-based determination of competitive effects. The dynamic competition paradigm calls for a multidisciplinary approach that draws on complexity economics, technology management, organizational behavior, and information and computer science.
Related Professionals
Prepare for what's next.
ThinkSet magazine, a BRG publication, provides nuanced, multifaceted thinking and expert guidance that help today’s business leaders adopt a more strategic, long-term mindset to prepare for what’s next.