Measuring the Value of Medical Services in Personal Injury Suits
BRG is home to renowned thought leaders and experts considered authorities in their fields of work. Our timely research and perspectives provide analysis and insights on the most important issues facing the industries and organizations we serve.
Personal injury suits typically include costs for a plaintiff ’s future medical bills. In most cases, plaintiffs’ attorneys use life care planners to estimate their clients’ future medical costs. Life care planners often use the billed charges of one healthcare provider or a small number of providers as the basis for calculating the value of the services they determine the plaintiff needs. However, provider charges are not an appropriate measure of the value of healthcare services. In fact, less than 5 percent of national healthcare payments are made based on provider charges. Instead, the US healthcare system uses the market value of healthcare products and services to establish payment levels. Market value should be used in personal injury cases as well.
In this white paper, Henry Miller, Greg Russo, and JoAnna Younts describe why provider-billed charges may be an inappropriate measure of the value of medical products and services, and how the market value of these services should be measured and applied in personal injury cases.
Prepare for what's next.
ThinkSet magazine, a BRG publication, provides nuanced, multifaceted thinking and expert guidance that help today’s business leaders adopt a more strategic, long-term mindset to prepare for what’s next.